Free classified ads | Online Auctions | Our Weeklies | Long distance call | Weblocal
The Chronicle
Send this text to a friend Print this article Comment on this article

RCMP public complaints commission upholds complaint over use of foreign officers

Canadian Press Article online since August 26th 2008, 23:00
Be the first to comment on this article
VANCOUVER - The RCMP contravened its own policy by allowing direct policing in British Columbia by Texas state troopers, the body that investigates complaints against the force says in a new report.
During an investigation involving the troopers, the force also had one of its own members conduct an impaired driving probe without proper grounds, detain the motorist unlawfully and search his vehicle unlawfully.
Those are the findings in a report released by the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP.
The report sparked by a complaint from B.C. Civil Liberties Association.
RCMP commissioner William Elliott accepted the findings and almost all the commission's recommendations involving the program called Operation Pipeline Convoy.
The civil liberties group took its complaints to the complaints commission in 2005 but a lengthy delay by the RCMP in responding to the 2006 interim report meant it took longer than expected for the final report to be released.
In a letter to the commission, Elliott promised to ensure the program was reviewed in keeping with a recommendation "to assess whether policing techniques shared and learned during these exchanges are fully compliant with Canadian law and the Charter."
Elliott also agreed with a key recommendation that "foreign police officers are formally provided policing status if they are to be exercising policing powers in Canada."
The commission said that during the Operation Pipeline exercise, two Texas state troopers and two RCMP members stopped a car twice based on suspicions of criminal activity.
"Troopers were involved in both stops of the motorist in question," the report said, adding "Texas state troopers were engaged in direct policing contrary to RCMP policy."
The report said that if the RCMP continues to engage in police exchanges it should formalize the status, such as by seeking special constable status.
The RCMP member who was found to have acted unlawfully said he was unaware that the first Mountie had legally stopped the car earlier. But he acknowledged that he was advised of the initial stop after he stopped the motorist.
RCMP spokesman Sgt. Tim Shields said Operation Pipeline is still active but does not use foreign officers to stop vehicles.
But he said U.S. police still share information.
"We all know that a police officer from outside the country doesn't have the powers of a peace officer here in B.C."
He said the program has been successful in finding illegal drugs and firearms on Canadian roads.
Foreign officers are now used only as observers, he said.
Murray Mollard, executive director of the B.C. Civil Liberties Association, said the RCMP program was designed to intercept suspicious vehicles that may be transporting drugs or drivers suspected of being impaired on drugs.
He said the program focused on the Trans-Canada Highway and specifically the area around Hope, B.C., a two-hour drive east of Vancouver.
"We had concerns about what are Texas Rangers doing stopping cars and engaging in active law enforcement in Canada?"
Mollard was not completely satisfied with the commission's findings.
"Unfortunately, though the commission substantiated a lot of our complaint, it didn't go that far as to say, 'It's bad policy for the RCMP . . . to use (foreign officers) to enforce the law in Canada."
They are not trained in Canadian law and there's no accountability mechanism in place if they "misconduct themselves," he said.
Mollard and Paul Kennedy, chairman of the complaints commission, chastised Elliott for taking so long to respond to the interim report.
"The delay was in excess of 18 months for a file in which the commissioner was in almost complete agreement," Kennedy said.
"Delays of this nature negatively impact both the effectiveness of any remedial measures and the perception of the complainant . . . and the public."
©All rights reserved, news from Canadian Press

These articles could also interest you

Your comments

Full name:
(required)


Email address:


Your comments :
(required)


Please retype the word displayed below Can't read the word?

Please retype the word displayed below:


Related Newspapers


Reader Poll